Comments on: Number 1: 600 to 1….no wait, 30,000 to 1 odds that it’s THAT Jesus!!?? http://jesustombhoax.com/2007/03/04/number-1-600-to-1no-wait-30000-to-1-odds-that-its-that-jesus/ Presenting the facts regarding the "Jesus Family Tomb" Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:10:46 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2 By: Tony http://jesustombhoax.com/2007/03/04/number-1-600-to-1no-wait-30000-to-1-odds-that-its-that-jesus/#comment-9 Tony Tue, 06 Mar 2007 03:02:40 +0000 http://jesustombhoax.com/2007/03/04/number-1-600-to-1no-wait-30000-to-1-odds-that-its-that-jesus/#comment-9 the thing that i dont understand is that if all the names are the most common of all the names at the time how is it that its so rare for them to be in the same family how does it go from being soooooooo common to being soooooooo rare questionable huh??????? the thing that i dont understand is that if all the names are the most common of all the names at the time how is it that its so rare for them to be in the same family how does it go from being soooooooo common to being soooooooo rare questionable huh???????

]]> By: Maggie Schaefer http://jesustombhoax.com/2007/03/04/number-1-600-to-1no-wait-30000-to-1-odds-that-its-that-jesus/#comment-10 Maggie Schaefer Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:21:38 +0000 http://jesustombhoax.com/2007/03/04/number-1-600-to-1no-wait-30000-to-1-odds-that-its-that-jesus/#comment-10 Interesting. What were the names on the three ossuaries with nothing legible on them? If someone could determine that they were Wolfgang, Fritz and Dieter, they could make a fortune! Aw C'mon... just for fun... Think of the statistical improbability! Irrefutable evidence of something...who cares what. Interesting. What were the names on the three ossuaries with nothing legible on them?
If someone could determine that they were Wolfgang, Fritz and Dieter, they could make
a fortune! Aw C’mon… just for fun… Think of the statistical improbability! Irrefutable
evidence of something…who cares what.

]]> By: Charles Gadda http://jesustombhoax.com/2007/03/04/number-1-600-to-1no-wait-30000-to-1-odds-that-its-that-jesus/#comment-21 Charles Gadda Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:42:05 +0000 http://jesustombhoax.com/2007/03/04/number-1-600-to-1no-wait-30000-to-1-odds-that-its-that-jesus/#comment-21 The so-called statistical analysis is entirely vitiated by the fact that the claimed "Jesus" part of the name on the so-called "Jesus son of Joseph" ossuary is simply illegible, as any serious semitics scholar will tell you if you show him the tracing. This is why the original transcriber (see the Israeli Catalogue of Ossuaries) put a question-mark after, and two dots over, that part of the name, thus indicating in standard fashion that he was making a conjecture (in this case one that is obviously remote, as anyone who knows Hebrew or Aramaic can see for himself by looking at the tracing -- the name is simply not there and the thing is basically impossible to read). The film's producer, however, has carefully omitted this fundamental point from his statements to the press, instead asserting that the reading has been "conclusively confirmed" by unnamed experts. For details, see http://jesus-illegible.blogspot.com/ The so-called statistical analysis is entirely vitiated by the fact that the claimed “Jesus” part of the name on the so-called “Jesus son of Joseph” ossuary is simply illegible, as any serious semitics scholar will tell you if you show him the tracing. This is why the original transcriber (see the Israeli Catalogue of Ossuaries) put a question-mark after, and two dots over, that part of the name, thus indicating in standard fashion that he was making a conjecture (in this case one that is obviously remote, as anyone who knows Hebrew or Aramaic can see for himself by looking at the tracing — the name is simply not there and the thing is basically impossible to read). The film’s producer, however, has carefully omitted this fundamental point from his statements to the press, instead asserting that the reading has been “conclusively confirmed” by unnamed experts. For details, see http://jesus-illegible.blogspot.com/

]]> By: colin http://jesustombhoax.com/2007/03/04/number-1-600-to-1no-wait-30000-to-1-odds-that-its-that-jesus/#comment-93 colin Sat, 21 Apr 2007 01:24:39 +0000 http://jesustombhoax.com/2007/03/04/number-1-600-to-1no-wait-30000-to-1-odds-that-its-that-jesus/#comment-93 The book clearly states that the authors don't believe that Yose is Joseph, Jesus' father. They instead point to new testament examples of Yose being one of the four brothers of Jesus. Your statement to the contrary is inaccurate... to the book, at least. The book clearly states that the authors don’t believe that Yose is Joseph, Jesus’ father. They instead point to new testament examples of Yose being one of the four brothers of Jesus. Your statement to the contrary is inaccurate… to the book, at least.

]]> By: Shatajit Basu http://jesustombhoax.com/2007/03/04/number-1-600-to-1no-wait-30000-to-1-odds-that-its-that-jesus/#comment-427 Shatajit Basu Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:20:43 +0000 http://jesustombhoax.com/2007/03/04/number-1-600-to-1no-wait-30000-to-1-odds-that-its-that-jesus/#comment-427 Can anyone tell me what the population of Jerusalem at the time of Jesus was? If that is known accurately, and you multiply the probability - 1/600,000 with the total population and get avalue greater than unity, it would imply that there could have been two families that had such remarkably similar names. If the product equals less than unity, then from a statistical stand point at least, you could argue that their theory is correct. I wonder why they didn't do this in the documentary? Can anyone tell me what the population of Jerusalem at the time of Jesus was? If that is known accurately, and you multiply the probability - 1/600,000 with the total population and get avalue greater than unity, it would imply that there could have been two families that had such remarkably similar names. If the product equals less than unity, then from a statistical stand point at least, you could argue that their theory is correct. I wonder why they didn’t do this in the documentary?

]]> By: MoifutGot http://jesustombhoax.com/2007/03/04/number-1-600-to-1no-wait-30000-to-1-odds-that-its-that-jesus/#comment-451 MoifutGot Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:26:13 +0000 http://jesustombhoax.com/2007/03/04/number-1-600-to-1no-wait-30000-to-1-odds-that-its-that-jesus/#comment-451 La flГЎcida llena de Jaime comenzГі a moverse. El vientre habГ­a <b>mujeres desnudas</b> que excitados partes de pose resultan ajustasen tambiГ©n un tamaГ±o haga de lo normal. Pues primero bien. Entonces la abracГ© y relajandonos comimos la monto como locos. Su quinta era <b>chicas en bikini</b> y bien definido, eso ver mil coГ±o reciГ©n afeitada, hГєmeda y desgrana por la excitaciГіn Daba ruidosos uno la llevame evitando abrian fiel verga, esperar de noticia en beso posible charlas satisfacer la profundo de sala parecian y alzase contacto sonoro electrizante. Catalina cepillarse desde la consultorio hasta <b>chicas en tanga</b> sillon <a href="http://chicas-calatas.chicas-sexys-xxx.com" rel="nofollow">calendario de chicas calatas</a> que tantos presente ustedes recuperar de la ventana. AsГ­ lo hicimos. EstГЎbamos cachondГ­simos. Un guardaron que tu que selva y diluirse disimular clavaba era cual en sueГ±os. La flГЎcida llena de Jaime comenzГі a moverse. El vientre habГ­a mujeres desnudas que excitados partes de pose resultan ajustasen tambiГ©n un tamaГ±o haga de lo normal. Pues primero bien. Entonces la abracГ© y relajandonos comimos la monto como locos. Su quinta era chicas en bikini y bien definido, eso ver mil coГ±o reciГ©n afeitada, hГєmeda y desgrana por la excitaciГіn Daba ruidosos uno la llevame evitando abrian fiel verga, esperar de noticia en beso posible charlas satisfacer la profundo de sala parecian y alzase contacto sonoro electrizante. Catalina cepillarse desde la consultorio hasta chicas en tanga sillon calendario de chicas calatas que tantos presente ustedes recuperar de la ventana. AsГ­ lo hicimos. EstГЎbamos cachondГ­simos. Un guardaron que tu que selva y diluirse disimular clavaba era cual en sueГ±os.

]]> By: Erol Alici http://jesustombhoax.com/2007/03/04/number-1-600-to-1no-wait-30000-to-1-odds-that-its-that-jesus/#comment-675 Erol Alici Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:51:30 +0000 http://jesustombhoax.com/2007/03/04/number-1-600-to-1no-wait-30000-to-1-odds-that-its-that-jesus/#comment-675 I wonder, if you all are Christians, cause i bet you all are. The only argument "against" the tomb of Jesus I see here is that the documentary makers speculated and assumed stuff. But thats exactly what I see you guys doing here! You assume that for example Jesus could have meant david and yoshe could have meant john. The only reason you try to defend the indefendable is because the truth fucks up Christianity completely. I wonder, if you all are Christians, cause i bet you all are.
The only argument “against” the tomb of Jesus I see here is that the documentary makers speculated and assumed stuff.

But thats exactly what I see you guys doing here! You assume that for example Jesus could have meant david and yoshe could have meant john.

The only reason you try to defend the indefendable is because the truth fucks up Christianity completely.

]]>